The problem this solves
Enrichment quality problems — low match rates, stale data, invalid emails — usually come from provider choice and input preparation, not from Clay itself.
Common situations
- Match rates are far below what providers promise.
- Emails bounce after enrichment.
- Credit spend per usable contact is too high.
Typical scope
- Provider selection and waterfall design
- Input normalization and dedupe keys
- Email validation strategy
- Cost-per-usable-record measurement
Systems involved
Clay data marketplace, your BYO provider keys, validators.
Deliverables
- Configured waterfalls with documented fallback order
- Match-rate baseline and improvement evidence
- Credit cost per usable record
What we need from you
Current providers, match rates, what fields you need, monthly volumes.
Technical considerations
Waterfall order affects both cost and data provenance — changes need a validation sample, not blind reruns.
How the request process works
- Submit the project form with your requirements (about 5 minutes).
- The CFE team reviews it and responds with scope and next steps.
- If there is a fit, you get a scoped proposal; if not, an honest referral to a better-fit resource.
Request this service
Describe your project — the form carries this service selection automatically.